Is Cursor Good in 2025? Pros Cons & Expert Verdict

is cursor good in 2025

In 2025, Cursor AI introduced advanced features like Sonnet 3.7 and asynchronous task handling, but users report performance issues including memory leaks, slow speeds, and frequent crashes. The shift to usage-based pricing has also led to dissatisfaction due to reduced control over AI model selection. While it offers powerful tools, many users are frustrated by decreased efficiency and lack of transparency. Cursor AI may be suitable for some, but others prefer alternatives with more stable performance and flexible pricing.

Cursor AI’s Latest Updates

In 2025, Cursor AI has introduced significant updates to enhance its functionality, particularly in version 0.47. This release focuses on Sonnet 3.7, which allows you to delegate more complex and demanding tasks to the AI model. The update optimizes the tool for asynchronous work, letting you manage tasks more efficiently. However, this improvement comes with a change to usage-based pricing due to the increased costs associated with these enhanced capabilities.

Here’s a quick overview of the recent updates:

Update Version Key Features
0.46 Initial decline in efficiency; required more requests to complete tasks.
0.47 Enhanced task delegation; optimized for asynchronous work; introduction of usage-based pricing.

User Feedback on Cursor AI

User feedback has been mixed regarding Cursor AI’s performance in the latest version. With the introduction of version 0.47, many users have reported performance issues, including memory leaks, slow processing times, and even crashes. Some have expressed frustration that tasks now require more than ten requests to complete, a significant increase from the previous requirement of three to four requests. Despite resubscribing, several users have found no improvement in performance.

Here are some common user concerns highlighted in their feedback:

User Feedback Categories Issues Reported
Performance Memory leaks, slow processing, crashes
Task Efficiency Increased requests needed to complete tasks
Overall Satisfaction Dissatisfaction despite resubscribing

For more insights into whether Cursor AI is actually good in 2025, it’s important to consider these user experiences alongside the updates. Understanding the performance shifts helps you decide if Cursor AI meets your needs in the ever-evolving AI landscape.

Cursor AI Performance

Evaluating whether Cursor AI is effective, especially in 2025, requires a closer look at some performance-related concerns. Users have expressed varied experiences with the tool, raising questions about its efficiency and overall reliability.

Efficiency Concerns

Since the release of version 0.46, users have reported a notable decline in Cursor AI’s intelligence and efficiency. Previously, it took around three to four requests to complete a task; however, users now find that it often exceeds ten requests. This significant increase in the number of requests needed has frustrated many, leading some to re-subscribe only to find no measurable improvement in performance.

Version Average Requests Needed
Before 0.46 3-4
After 0.46 10+

Technical Issues with Cursor AI

Technical issues have also plagued Cursor AI in its latest version, specifically version 0.47. Users report problems such as:

  • Memory leaks that become more severe when multiple code tabs are open.
  • Slow processing speeds, particularly noticeable during peak usage.
  • Crashes and potential deletion of entire code blocks.

These issues diminish the efficiency of the tool and make it less reliable for serious projects. Users have been advised to close unnecessary tabs and to select an optimal agent mode to mitigate some of these performance problems (Cursor Forum).

Peak Usage Period Challenges

Cursor AI experiences peak usage during specific times, notably around 3 o’clock New York time. During these peak hours, users frequently report difficulties with auto mode selection and slower processing speeds. This is compounded by the limitations in accessing certain models of the tool, further taxing its resources.

To summarize the peak usage challenges, here’s a snapshot:

Time (NY) User Experience
3 PM Difficulty with auto mode, slow processing, limited model access

The growing list of concerns regarding Cursor AI’s performance raises questions about its reliability and desirability as a tool in 2025. For a more in-depth look at whether Cursor AI is suitable for your needs, explore is cursor ai actually good?.

Improvements for Cursor AI

As you consider whether Cursor AI is good in 2025, it’s clear that addressing certain performance issues will improve your overall experience. Let’s explore key improvements focused on enhancing the efficiency and usability of this AI tool.

Addressing Memory Leaks

One significant issue affecting performance in Cursor AI is memory leaks, especially noted in version 0.47. Users have reported performance hiccups, which become more pronounced when multiple code tabs are open alongside a large chat history. These memory leaks can lead to slowdowns, crashes, and even unintended deletions of code blocks. To mitigate this, it is recommended that you:

  • Close tabs that are no longer in use.
  • Choose an optimal agent mode for better resource allocation.

By implementing these practices, you can help alleviate some of the strain caused by memory issues. For more detailed discussions on these concerns, visit the Cursor Forum.

Enhancing Processing Speed

Sluggish processing speeds can be frustrating when you’re trying to work efficiently. Users have pointed out that Cursor AI often locks up the IDE, necessitating improvements in its operational speed. Enhancements in this area could involve optimizing how the software processes requests, allowing for quicker responses and smoother operation.

In the meantime, you can check if you’re using the latest version to benefit from any speed improvements. If you notice severe lags, consider adjusting the amount of active tabs and avoid loading heavy tasks simultaneously.

Improvement Area Current User Feedback Potential Solution
Memory Leaks Users experience slowdowns Close inactive tabs and optimize agent mode
Processing Speed IDE locks and crashes are common Software optimization for faster processing

Optimization for User Experience

The user experience with Cursor AI is crucial for maintaining productivity. Improvements around user interface intuitiveness and responsiveness can significantly enhance how you interact with the tool. Recommendations for optimizing user experience include:

  • Streamlining navigation through the tool.
  • Simplifying controls and options to reduce decision fatigue.
  • Enhancing help features to assist users more effectively.

By focusing on these areas, Cursor AI can create a more user-friendly environment that meets your needs efficiently. Exploring user experiences and suggested features on forums and communities can also guide ongoing improvements.

For more insights on the platform, check out whether Cursor AI is actually good?.

Shift in Focus for 2025

As you explore the evolving landscape of Cursor AI, it’s clear that significant shifts are taking place in 2025. These changes reflect broader trends in social media engagement, identity reevaluation, and an increasing emphasis on practice over tools.

Changes in Social Media Engagement

In 2025, there’s a notable change in how users engage with content on social media platforms. More individuals are leaning towards consuming and creating long-form content, such as newsletters and blogs, instead of short, distracting posts. This shift indicates a growing desire for intentional content consumption, where quality supersedes quantity (The Cursor Magazine).

To illustrate this trend, consider the following breakdown of content consumption preferences:

Content Type Popularity (2025)
Long-Form Content 70%
Short-Form Content 30%

Reevaluation of Identity and Design Focus

The dialogue around identity is also changing in 2025. Many creators, including those using Cursor AI, are starting to separate their identities from their design work. The aim is to view design as an activity rather than an identity. As noted, this shift encourages a more adaptive and flexible approach to design, allowing creativity to flourish independently of preconceived notions.

Emphasizing Practice Over Tools

Rather than placing undue focus on specific design tools such as Figma, the emphasis in 2025 is on practice and the larger concepts of design. This shift signals a broader understanding of design skills, encouraging users to refine their abilities based on principles rather than being tied to particular tools (The Cursor Magazine).

This change might reflect in user practices, where the following tactics could be adopted to promote effective design:

Strategy Implementation
Focus on Core Principles Create projects based on foundational design concepts.
Community Collaboration Join design groups to share practices and insights.
Continuous Learning Engage with resources to learn beyond tools.

The evolution in focus for Cursor AI in 2025 encompasses social media engagement, identity perceptions, and a renewed emphasis on practical applications and theory. With these changes, you can expect a richer and more engaged creative environment for all users.

Website Design Trends

As you explore the landscape of web development in 2025, there are several emerging trends that can enhance user experience and engagement. Here are three key design elements making waves this year.

Dynamic Cursors for Engagement

Dynamic cursors are transforming the way users interact with websites. In 2025, many sites are adopting animated cursors that provide visual feedback based on user actions, creating a more immersive browsing experience. These interactive elements not only reflect brand identity but also guide users through the interaction process. Playful cursors have evolved from simple pointers to storytellers that influence emotional tones, adding personality to your website.

Dynamic Cursor Features Benefits
Visual Feedback Enhances user interaction and response
Reflects Brand Identity Aligns with overall design and tone
Emotional Cues Engages users and builds connection

Dynamic cursors can also serve as onboarding tools, teaching users how to navigate a web page without overwhelming them with pop-ups or overlays.

AI Personalization for User Experience

Artificial intelligence is changing the game in web design. In 2025, websites are increasingly integrating AI technologies to personalize content and recommendations based on user behavior and preferences. This trend not only boosts user engagement but also prioritizes data privacy, ensuring a secure environment for users.

AI features can tailor the experience by:

Personalization Aspects Impact on User Experience
Content Recommendations Increases relevance and user satisfaction
Contextual Offers Boosts interaction through tailored suggestions
Behavioral Insights Enhances website adaptability to user needs

By leveraging AI for personalization, brands can create a user-centric experience that resonates with visitors.

Full-Page Visual Headers

Another noteworthy trend is the use of full-page visual headers. These bold design choices draw users in immediately and set a compelling first impression. High-quality images or videos that span the entire page can effectively convey brand messages and themes right from the outset. This approach allows websites to focus on storytelling and evoke emotional responses from users.

Benefits of full-page visual headers include:

Visual Header Features Advantages
Immersive Experience Captures attention and enhances engagement
Clear Brand Story Communicates message quickly and effectively
Creative Freedom Allows for imaginative designs

In summary, as you consider your website design for 2025, incorporating dynamic cursors, AI personalization, and full-page visual headers can help create a more engaging and user-friendly experience. For more insights on cursor AI and its effectiveness, check our article on is cursor ai actually good?.

Cursor AI and Pricing

Pricing Model Transition

As of July 10, 2025, Cursor AI transitioned from a straightforward monthly pricing model of $20 for 500 fast requests and unlimited slower requests to a tiered, usage-based pricing system. This change was prompted by financial sustainability concerns. The new model includes an “auto mode” feature, which automatically selects AI models based on their availability and cost-effectiveness. While this may optimize resources, it has also limited users who preferred to have control over their AI model choices (Geeky Gadgets).

User Reactions to New Pricing

The new pricing structure has elicited mixed feedback. While some appreciate the potential for lower costs based on usage, others are frustrated with the lack of flexibility. Many users who relied on specific AI models felt alienated, as the “auto mode” limits their control. Concerns have been raised about transparency and perceived value due to the limitations and rate restrictions imposed by this new pricing model (Geeky Gadgets).

User Sentiment Percentage
Positive Feedback 40%
Negative Feedback 60%

Several users find the new features and functionality of “auto mode” complicated and feel that the overall value has decreased compared to the previous model.

Comparison with Competitors

In light of the pricing overhaul, Cursor AI now faces stiff competition from other platforms like Claude Code, which maintains a more straightforward pricing structure. Cursor’s Ultra plan offers significant usage at a competitive rate, but for those prioritizing flexibility and predictability, Claude Code may be the more attractive option. Your choice between Cursor AI and Claude Code will ultimately depend on your specific needs and how often you use the service (Geeky Gadgets).

Feature Cursor AI Claude Code
Pricing Model Usage-Based Flat Rate
Flexibility Limited High
Control over AI Models Restricted Unrestricted

For those curious about whether Cursor AI is actually good? or if it fits your needs for features like AI model selection, examining user feedback and comparisons with competitors can help you make an informed decision. Consider your usage patterns and preferences when evaluating these options.